by APS Interview Coach | Mar 16, 2026 | APS Interview Coaching, Public Service News, Uncategorized
APS Hiring Freeze 2026: What Job Seekers Need to Know
Many candidates searching for Australian Public Service jobs in 2026 are hearing the phrase “APS hiring freeze”. While there is not a single formal government-wide freeze currently in place across all agencies, recruitment activity has clearly slowed.
Across multiple departments, agency leaders have been asked to identify budget savings and prioritise essential spending. In response, some agencies have reduced contractor numbers, delayed recruitment rounds, or paused hiring for non-essential roles. These changes have created the perception of a hiring freeze in parts of the public service.
Reports in late 2025 confirmed that federal agencies were instructed to identify savings of up to 5 per cent within their budgets, prompting reductions in project spending and slower recruitment activity across departments.
At the same time, several state governments have also begun tightening public sector spending. For example, the Victorian Government announced plans to reduce more than 1000 public sector jobs as part of a broader effort to control workforce costs and reduce debt.
These changes do not necessarily mean that government recruitment has stopped. However, they do mean that:
- Fewer roles are being advertised externally
- Internal candidates are increasingly competing for positions
- Agencies are relying more heavily on merit pools and internal mobility
- Competition for advertised roles has increased significantly
Why Competition for APS Jobs Is Increasing
Even when recruitment slows, the demand for public sector jobs remains extremely strong. Government roles are attractive because they offer job stability, structured career progression, and competitive salaries.
When fewer vacancies are advertised, application volumes increase dramatically. It is now common for APS and State Government roles to receive hundreds of applications.
This is one of the main reasons why many agencies use Applicant Tracking Systems such as PageUp to screen applications before they reach a human panel.
If your application is not clearly aligned with capability frameworks such as the APS Integrated Leadership System and Work Level Standards, it may never progress to the interview stage.
You can learn more about preparing for these structured interviews here:
APS STAR Interview Method Guide
What This Means for Applicants in 2026
For candidates pursuing APS or State Government roles, the tightening job market means preparation is more important than ever.
Applicants who rely on generic resumes or basic interview preparation are often filtered out early in the recruitment process.
Candidates who invest time in understanding government capability frameworks, structuring strong STAR responses, and aligning their experience to the expectations of the role have a much stronger chance of progressing through the recruitment process.
If you would like support preparing for an APS interview, you can explore available services here:
Government Interview Coaching Services
by APS Interview Coach | Mar 16, 2026 | APS Interview Coaching, APS Interviews, APS PageUp Ai ATS
How to Beat the ATS Algorithms and Get Shortlisted
To beat the automated algorithms and avoid the high filter-out rate that many applicants experience, you must move away from generic applications.
Because some government roles now receive hundreds of applications, Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) are often used as the first stage of screening. These systems scan resumes, pitch statements and selection criteria responses before a human panel reviews them.
Candidates who submit generic applications often never reach the interview stage.
To bypass this digital screening layer and get shortlisted, you need to structure your application strategically.
Below are the methods experienced government recruiters expect to see.
Calibrate Your Application to Government Capability Frameworks
Your resume and selection criteria responses must align directly with the capability frameworks used by government agencies.
For federal roles, this includes:
- APS Integrated Leadership System (ILS)
- APS Work Level Standards
The Integrated Leadership System provides capability development guidance for individuals and agencies, including behavioural descriptions expected at each APS classification level. [1]
Work Level Standards then define the responsibilities, complexity and expectations associated with each APS classification. [2]
If your examples do not clearly demonstrate the behavioural indicators associated with the relevant level, panel members will not score them highly.
You can review practical examples of framework-aligned responses here:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/star-method-interview-aps/
Build Responses Around Government Scoring Matrices
Government interviews are not subjective conversations.
They are structured scoring exercises.
Panels use detailed grading matrices to evaluate candidates against specific behavioural indicators. Each answer is scored according to how well it demonstrates the capability being assessed.
Former government executives who have chaired recruitment panels understand exactly how these matrices work.
When preparing for an interview, your responses should be structured so that each example clearly demonstrates:
- the capability being assessed
- The complexity expected at your classification level
- measurable outcomes
- leadership behaviours where relevant
This dramatically improves your scoring potential.
Optimise Your Resume for ATS Systems
A government resume must be structured differently from a private sector resume.
Applicant Tracking Systems evaluate formatting, keyword alignment and capability language before applications reach human reviewers.
To ensure your resume passes ATS filtering, it should include:
- capability aligned keywords
- clearly structured responsibilities and outcomes
- terminology aligned to the classification level of the role
Candidates preparing applications can review professional resume guidance here:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-resume-services/
Craft Selection Criteria That Demonstrate Capability
Selection criteria responses are one of the most important elements of a government job application.
These responses must demonstrate capability using the STAR method, but they must also align with the behavioural expectations of the framework used by the hiring agency.
A strong response typically includes:
- a clear situation or challenge
- Your specific role and responsibility
- the actions you personally took
- measurable outcomes that demonstrate impact
You can learn more about developing strong responses here:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/selection-criteria/
Use Professional Coaching or Independent Application Audits
Many candidates underestimate how competitive government recruitment processes have become.
Professional preparation can significantly improve application quality and interview performance.
Specialised services such as PS Interview Coach offer structured preparation tools that help candidates refine their applications.
AI Content Performance Audits
Programs such as Performance Core and Excellence include deep analysis of competency responses to ensure they align with capability frameworks and interview scoring structures.
Rapid Strategy Sessions
Short intensive consultations can review your STAR examples and recalibrate your responses to align with the APS Integrated Leadership System and relevant Work Level Standards.
Self-Guided Strategy Systems
Candidates who prefer independent preparation can access structured resources, including preparation guides, example responses and strategy frameworks.
Explore the available services here:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/interview-services/
The Experience Behind PS Interview Coach
PS Interview Coach is built around the practical experience of former government recruitment decision makers.
The coaching team includes former Australian Public Service executives who have chaired and participated in government interview panels.
This background provides valuable insight into:
- How panel scoring systems operate
- How capability frameworks are applied during recruitment
- How selection criteria responses are evaluated
The Integrated Leadership System used in APS recruitment provides behavioural descriptions and capability expectations across all levels of the public service. [1]
Because of this insider knowledge, coaching focuses on helping candidates structure responses in a way that aligns with the frameworks and scoring matrices used by government panels.
Candidates interested in learning more about the team can read about their approach here:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/why-hire-us/
Final Thought
The biggest mistake candidates make is assuming government recruitment works like private sector hiring.
It does not.
Government hiring is structured, scored and highly framework-driven.
If you move away from generic applications and instead align your responses precisely with capability frameworks and scoring matrices, you dramatically increase your chances of being shortlisted.
In a market where some roles receive hundreds of applications, that strategic alignment can be the difference between repeated rejection and securing your next promotion.
Friendly Reminder
While the strategies discussed in this article reflect current best practice for government job applications, it is important to understand that following any advice in this blog does not guarantee a successful outcome.
Australian Public Service and State Government recruitment processes involve multiple factors that are outside any applicant’s control. These can include the strength of competing candidates, internal applicants, agency priorities, panel preferences, and the scoring process used during recruitment.
Many government hiring processes are structured around capability frameworks such as the APS Integrated Leadership System and Work Level Standards, which define behavioural expectations and work complexity at each classification level. Even when candidates prepare strong applications aligned to these frameworks, final outcomes will always depend on the overall merit assessment conducted by the hiring panel.
At PS Interview Coach, our guidance is based on extensive experience with public sector recruitment processes and reflects the best practices used by many successful candidates. Our goal is to help applicants present their experience clearly, align their responses with government capability frameworks, and improve their confidence in interviews.
However, no preparation method can guarantee success through either automated screening systems or human assessment panels. Every recruitment process is unique, and final decisions always remain with the hiring agency.
Think of the strategies in this guide as tools to improve your competitiveness and preparation, not as a guarantee of an offer.
If you would like personalised feedback on your resume, selection criteria, or interview preparation, you can explore our services here:
APS & Government Interview Coaching
by APS Interview Coach | Mar 16, 2026 | APS Interview Coaching
APS & State Gov Job Cuts 2026: Why Securing a Government Job Just Got Harder (And How to Beat the Odds)
If you’re trying to secure a role or win a promotion in the Australian Public Service (APS) or State Government in 2026, you’ve probably already noticed something has changed.
The public sector hiring landscape is becoming increasingly competitive. Budgets are under pressure, agencies are being asked to identify efficiency savings, and recruitment is slowing across multiple jurisdictions.
The result?
Fewer jobs are being advertised, and far more applicants are competing for every role.
For serious candidates, this means the margin between success and rejection is now razor-thin.
Here’s what’s happening in the government job market—and how to give yourself a genuine competitive edge.
The 2026 Public Sector Reality: Budget Pressure and Hiring Slowdowns
Across Australia, governments are actively searching for ways to reduce spending and improve efficiency.
Federal departments have been instructed to identify up to 5% in savings, which has triggered fears of workforce reductions and hiring slowdowns across the APS. (ABC News)
While large-scale layoffs have not been formally announced, agencies have responded by:
- Reducing contractor numbers
- Pausing recruitment for non-essential roles
- Delaying or cancelling planned hiring rounds
At the state level, similar cost-cutting measures are already underway.
For example, the Victorian Government has announced plans to cut more than 1,000 public sector jobs as part of a $4 billion savings plan, with many reductions focused on senior roles. (ABC News)
Even where jobs are not being eliminated outright, departments are increasingly relying on:
- natural attrition
- internal mobility
- temporary acting arrangements
This means fewer externally advertised roles.
The Hidden Impact: Record Application Volumes
When job numbers fall, but demand remains high, the inevitable result is application saturation.
Across the APS and state government recruitment systems, many advertised roles are now receiving hundreds of applications.
It is increasingly common for roles to attract:
- 250–400 applicants
- multiple internal candidates
- applicants from contractors transitioning to permanent roles
- interstate applicants competing remotely
Before a human hiring panel even reviews your application, Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) such as PageUp are often used to filter responses.
If your resume, pitch, or selection criteria do not align with the expected government frameworks, your application may never reach the interview stage.
If you want to understand how these systems filter candidates, read our guide:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-ai-recruitment-tips/
Why “Standard STAR Answers” Are No Longer Enough
Many candidates believe that simply using the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) is enough to succeed.
Unfortunately, most applicants use STAR incorrectly or too generically.
High-scoring APS responses require:
- precise alignment to capability frameworks
- measurable outcomes
- strong leadership behaviours
- strategic thinking appropriate to the classification level
If you’re unfamiliar with how to structure these responses effectively, review our guide here:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/star-method-interview-aps/
Or explore additional preparation resources in our:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-interview-tips-resources/
Government Interviews Are Scored Against Capability Frameworks
Government recruitment panels assess candidates using structured frameworks such as:
- APS Integrated Leadership System (ILS)
- State Government capability frameworks
- behavioural competency indicators
- formal scoring matrices
Your responses must demonstrate evidence of behaviours expected at your classification level.
For example:
Entry-Level APS Roles
APS3–APS4 applicants must demonstrate operational capability and teamwork.
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-3-4-interview-coaching/
Mid-Level APS Roles
APS5 and APS6 candidates must demonstrate independent judgment and stakeholder engagement.
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-5-interview-coaching/
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-6-interview-coaching/
Executive Roles
EL1 and EL2 interviews require strategic leadership, governance insight, and policy influence.
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/executive-interview-coaching/
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-executive-level-el1-el2-insights/
Understanding the expectations at your level is critical to scoring highly in interviews.
State Government Competition Is Increasing Too
State government recruitment has become just as competitive as federal APS hiring.
Each jurisdiction has its own capability frameworks and classification structures.
Our coaching programs provide specialised preparation for:
NSW Government
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/nsw-government-interview-coaching/
Victorian Public Service
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/vps-interview-coaching/
Queensland Public Sector
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/qld-public-sector-interview-coaching/
ACT Government
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/act-government-interview-coaching/
If you are transitioning from the private sector, you may also find this guide useful:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/private-to-public/
Why Professional Interview Coaching Is Becoming Essential
When hundreds of applicants compete for a single role, being “good enough” is no longer enough.
You must be able to:
- Translate your experience into government capability language
- deliver concise, high-impact STAR responses
- Demonstrate leadership behaviours appropriate to your level
- anticipate panel scoring expectations
Professional coaching provides an advantage by helping candidates:
✔ Decode the scoring frameworks
✔ Structure stronger behavioural responses
✔ Improve executive communication
✔ Avoid common panel scoring traps
How PS Interview Coach Helps Candidates Win Roles
At PS Interview Coach, our coaching is delivered by former government hiring managers and executives with over 40 years of combined recruitment experience.
Our services include:
Interview coaching
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/interview-services/
Selection criteria and pitch writing
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/selection-criteria/
APS resume optimisation
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/aps-resume-services/
You can also review real success stories from clients here:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/coaching-case-studies/
The Real Cost of Delaying Your Promotion
Many candidates underestimate the financial impact of a delayed promotion.
If you miss an APS6 or EL1 opportunity by just one year, the lost salary difference can easily exceed $10,000–$25,000 annually.
In a tightening recruitment market, investing in professional preparation can significantly accelerate your career progression.
Ready to Give Yourself a Competitive Edge?
If you’re preparing for an upcoming APS or State Government interview, the best step you can take is to speak with an expert.
Book a free consultation with PS Interview Coach today:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/free-consultation/
Or explore our pricing options:
https://psinterviewcoach.com.au/pricing/
Because in a market where hundreds of applicants compete for every role, preparation is no longer optional.
It’s your competitive advantage!
by APS Interview Coach | Mar 5, 2026 | APS Interview Coaching, APS PageUp Ai ATS
Most APS resumes fail before a human reads them. Not because the applicant lacks experience, but because PageUp, the applicant tracking system used by most APS agencies, cannot find the keywords it is looking for. This guide shows you exactly which keywords to use, how to write selection criteria that satisfy both the ATS and the panel, and how to stand out in government job applications in Australia in 2025.
Whether you are applying at APS3, APS6, or Executive Level, the same principles apply: mirror the language of the job advertisement, use the correct ILS capability names, and back every claim with specific, quantified evidence.
Contents
- How PageUp Reads Your APS Resume
- The APS Resume Keyword Strategy for 2025
- The ILS Capability Framework: What Goes in Your Resume
- How to Write APS Selection Criteria Using the STAR Method
- Worked STAR Example: Achieves Results
- Can AI Help With Your APS Application?
- How to Stand Out in Government Job Applications in Australia
- Capability Framework Quick Reference by Jurisdiction
- Frequently Asked Questions
How PageUp Reads Your APS Resume
PageUp is the applicant tracking system (ATS) used by the majority of Australian Public Service agencies. When you upload your resume, PageUp parses the document — extracting the text and comparing it to the keywords and phrases in the job advertisement. It then assigns a relevance score. Applications that score below a threshold are ranked lower in the shortlist queue, often before a human panel reviews them.
Understanding how PageUp reads your document is the first step to making sure it reads it correctly.
File Format
Submit your resume as a .docx file wherever possible. PageUp parses Word documents more reliably than PDFs. PDFs — particularly those generated from scanned documents or built with complex design software — can produce garbled text when parsed, causing critical information to be missed or misread entirely. If the application only accepts PDF, export directly from Word rather than using a designer tool.
Layout and Formatting
PageUp’s parser reads text in a linear, left-to-right, top-to-bottom sequence. Any formatting that breaks this flow will cause parsing errors. Avoid the following in your APS resume:
- Tables — content inside table cells is often skipped or read out of order
- Multiple columns — the parser reads column 1 fully before column 2, which can place your job titles next to the wrong dates
- Text boxes — content inside text boxes is frequently invisible to the parser
- Headers and footers — your name and contact details placed here may not be read
- Decorative fonts and icons — these can be rendered as unreadable characters
- Embedded images of text — the parser cannot read images
Use a clean, single-column layout. Use standard headings: Work Experience, Education, Skills, Professional Development. Use Arial, Calibri, or Georgia at 10–12pt. Keep margins at 2cm or wider. Name your file clearly: Firstname-Lastname-Resume-APS-RoleTitle.docx.
Length
APS resumes should be two to four pages, depending on level. At APS3–APS5, two to three pages are appropriate. At APS6 and EL1, three to four pages is standard. Senior Executive Service (SES) resumes may extend to five pages. Remove roles older than 15 years unless directly relevant to the position.
→ See our APS Resume Services for expert resume review and rewriting
The APS Resume Keyword Strategy for 2025
PageUp performs keyword matching between your resume text and the job advertisement. The closer the language in your resume matches the language in the advertisement and selection criteria, the higher your match score. This is the single most impactful optimisation you can make to your APS resume in 2025.
Step 1 — Extract Keywords from the Job Advertisement
Before writing or updating your resume, copy the full text of the job advertisement — including the position overview, key duties, and selection criteria — into a separate document. Then highlight:
- Every capability name (from the ILS or relevant state framework)
- Every action verb (e.g. lead, develop, coordinate, advise, analyse)
- Every technical term specific to the role (e.g. budget management, stakeholder engagement, policy development, legislative compliance)
- Every tool or system named (e.g. SAP, Objective, TRIM, Salesforce)
These highlighted terms are your target keywords. Every one of them should appear at least once in your resume — verbatim, not paraphrased.
Step 2 — Check for Exact Phrase Matches
PageUp performs literal phrase matching, not semantic matching. This means it does not understand that “manages stakeholder relationships” and “stakeholder engagement” refer to the same skill. If the job advertisement uses “stakeholder engagement,” your resume must use “stakeholder engagement” — not “stakeholder management,” not “relationship management.”
This is particularly important for ILS capability names. If the advertisement lists “Communicates with Influence” as a selection criterion, that exact phrase must appear in your resume or pitch. A synonym will not score.
Step 3 — Distribute Keywords Across Your Resume
Do not cluster all keywords in one section. Distribute them naturally across:
- Professional summary/career profile (top of the document — PageUp weights early content more heavily)
- Key skills or capabilities section (a short list of 8–12 capabilities and technical terms)
- Each role description — use keywords in context within bullet points
Aim for your top five keywords to appear two to three times across the document. Do not exceed this — keyword stuffing is detectable and will cost you credibility with the human panel.
Step 4 — Use the APS Work Level Standards Language
The APS Work Level Standards describe the expected behaviours and outputs at each classification level. Agencies use this language directly in job advertisements. Familiarise yourself with the Standards at your target level and incorporate the exact phrases into your resume descriptions.
For example, at APS6, the Work Level Standards use phrases such as “exercising a degree of independent judgment,” “providing advice and analysis,” and “contributing to team and branch outcomes.” These phrases belong in your resume if you are applying at APS6.
→ Browse our APS Interview Tips and Resources library
The ILS Capability Framework: What Goes in Your Resume
The Integrated Leadership System (ILS) is the APS capability framework. It defines the behaviours and characteristics expected of effective APS leaders and employees at each classification level. The ILS capability names appear directly in APS job advertisements and are the primary keywords PageUp is scanning for.
There are five core ILS capability clusters. Each cluster contains specific capabilities that are described in behavioural terms. The exact names below are the phrases that must appear in your resume and pitch — not paraphrases.
The Five ILS Capability Clusters
1. Shapes Strategic Thinking
- Inspires a sense of purpose and direction
- Focuses strategically
- Harnesses information and opportunities
- Shows judgment, intelligence and common sense
2. Achieves Results
- Builds organisational capability and responsiveness
- Marshals professional expertise
- Steers and implements change and deals with uncertainty
- Delivers intended results
3. Supports Productive Working Relationships (APS1–EL1) / Cultivates Productive Working Relationships (EL2 and above)
- Nurtures internal and external relationships
- Facilitates cooperation and partnerships
- Values individual differences and diversity
- Guides, mentors and develops people
4. Exemplifies Personal Drive and Integrity
- Demonstrates public service professionalism and probity
- Engages with risk and shows personal courage
- Commits to action
- Displays resilience
- Demonstrates self-awareness and a commitment to personal development
5. Communicates with Influence
- Communicates clearly
- Listens, understands and adapts to the audience
- Negotiates persuasively
How to Embed ILS Capability Names in Your Resume
Do not list ILS capabilities as a standalone section. Instead, embed the capability names within your role descriptions and achievement statements so they appear in context. This satisfies the PageUp keyword scan and provides the human panel with evidence in the same sentence.
Weak (capability named, no evidence):
Demonstrated Achieves Results and Communicates with Influence across multiple projects.
Strong (capability named with evidence):
Led a cross-divisional project team to deliver a revised procurement framework three weeks ahead of schedule, demonstrating Achieves Results under competing resource and stakeholder pressures. Communicated with Influence by presenting the framework to the Executive Leadership Group and securing unanimous approval at the first submission.
The second version uses the exact ILS capability names and immediately provides specific, verifiable evidence. PageUp scores the keyword; the panel sees the capability in action.
→ Get expert help with APS selection criteria writing
How to Write APS Selection Criteria Using the STAR Method
The STAR method — Situation, Task, Action, Result — is the standard structure for APS selection criteria responses. Most APS roles at APS3 and above require applicants to address selection criteria, either through a pitch statement submitted in PageUp or through written responses to targeted questions. The STAR method provides the structure; your specific, first-person evidence provides the substance.
Situation (2–3 sentences)
Set the context for your example. Name the agency or organisation (you can say “a Commonwealth agency” if required for privacy), the nature of the role, the size of the team, and the challenge or context that makes this example relevant. Keep this section brief — its purpose is to orient the reader, not to tell the full story.
What to include: agency type, team size, the problem or context, the stakes.
What to avoid: unnecessary background, vague descriptions, anything that does not directly set up the Task.
Task (1 sentence)
State your specific, individual responsibility in this situation. This is the most commonly mishandled section of a STAR response. Many applicants describe what the team was responsible for rather than what they personally were accountable for. The APS merit principle requires you to demonstrate your individual capability — not the team’s.
Use first person singular: “I was responsible for…” or “My role was to…”
Action (4–6 sentences)
This is the longest and most important section. Describe in specific detail what you personally did: the steps you took, the decisions you made, the stakeholders you engaged, the methods or frameworks you applied, and the challenges you navigated. Use first-person active verbs throughout.
Strong action verbs for APS applications include: led, developed, designed, implemented, advised, coordinated, negotiated, analysed, presented, facilitated, drafted, managed, resolved, built, and delivered.
This is also the section where ILS capability language appears most naturally. If the criterion is “Communicates with Influence,” your action sentences should describe communication activities: presentations, written advice, negotiations, and briefings.
Result (1–2 sentences)
State the outcome of your actions. Quantify wherever possible — this is the element most often missing from APS selection criteria responses, and its absence weakens even a well-structured example.
Ways to quantify a result:
- Numbers: “reduced processing time by 30 per cent”
- Scale: “delivered to 1,200 staff across six sites”
- Timeframes: “completed three weeks ahead of schedule”
- Recognition: “commended by the Deputy Secretary” or “adopted as agency-wide policy”
- Ongoing impact: “The framework has been in continuous operation since 2023 with no significant amendments”
If you genuinely cannot quantify, describe who benefited, what changed, and what has sustained as a result of your actions.
→ See our full STAR Method guide for APS applications and interviews
Worked STAR Example: Achieves Results (APS Policy Context)
The following is a complete, publishable STAR example written for the ILS capability “Achieves Results” in an APS policy context. It is approximately 190 words — appropriate for a written selection criteria response at APS5–EL1 level.
Working as a Senior Policy Officer within a federal regulatory agency, I was a member of a cross-agency working group tasked with reviewing and updating the department’s grants assessment framework following an internal audit that identified significant inconsistencies in decision-making processes.
I was individually responsible for developing the revised assessment criteria, designing the stakeholder consultation approach, and drafting the final framework document for Executive consideration.
To Achieves Results within the 10-week project window, I developed a staged consultation plan that prioritised the four peak body stakeholders whose feedback had historically delayed previous policy processes. I facilitated three structured workshops using an interest-based negotiation model, mapped each stakeholder’s core concern against the draft criteria, and resolved six substantive objections through targeted redrafting. I also managed the project timeline independently while my immediate supervisor was on extended leave, escalating one significant risk to the Deputy Secretary with a recommended mitigation strategy that was approved without amendment.
The revised framework was adopted in full by the Senior Executive Committee and has since reduced average grants assessment time by 22 per cent, as measured in the department’s 2024–25 annual performance report.
What this example does well:
- Name the agency type and team context (cross-agency working group)
- Clearly states individual accountability in the Task sentence
- Uses first-person active verbs throughout (developed, designed, drafted, facilitated, mapped, resolved, managed, escalated)
- Names the ILS capability “Achieves Results” once, naturally embedded in the Action section
- Closes with a specific, independently verifiable quantified result (22 per cent reduction, cited source)
- Total word count: approximately 190 words — within the typical selection criteria word limit per criterion
Can AI Help With Your APS Application?
AI tools — including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot — can assist with certain parts of your APS application. They cannot replace the human judgment, personal evidence, and APS-specific expertise that your application ultimately requires.
What AI Can Do Well
- Generate a draft structure — AI can produce a STAR template or pitch outline based on a job advertisement you provide
- Check grammar and tone — AI is effective at identifying grammatical errors, passive voice, and overly complex sentence structures
- Suggest keywords — if you provide the full job advertisement, AI can identify the capability names and technical terms you should be targeting
- Rephrase weak sentences — AI can improve clarity and directness in sentences you have already drafted
- Identify gaps — AI can compare your draft against the selection criteria and flag sections that are thin on evidence
What AI Cannot Do
- Write your STAR examples — AI does not know what you did, where you worked, who you worked with, or what you achieved. Any STAR example an AI generates is fictional and will be generic
- Demonstrate your individual merit — the APS merit principle requires evidence of your specific, personal capability. AI-generated evidence is not your evidence
- Match PageUp keywords reliably — AI tools do not have current access to how PageUp scores applications at specific agencies. Keyword optimisation requires knowledge of the specific job advertisement
- Replace specialist coaching — the nuances of APS recruitment — Work Level Standards, integrity requirements, panel dynamics — require human expertise to navigate well
The Integrity Risk
A growing number of APS agencies are including statements in their application forms asking applicants to confirm that the content they submit is their own and accurately reflects their experience. Submitting AI-generated content that misrepresents your skills or experience carries genuine risk — not only to your application, but to your ongoing reputation within the APS, where selection panels and hiring managers are often known to each other across agencies.
Use AI as a preparation tool. Write the evidence yourself.
→ Read our full guide: APS AI Recruitment Tips — What Works and What Doesn’t
How to Stand Out in Government Job Applications in Australia
Most APS and state government applicants make the same mistakes: generic language, team-level achievements, no quantification, and selection criteria that describe duties rather than demonstrate capability. Standing out does not require extraordinary experience — it requires presenting your existing experience in a way that is specific, structured, and aligned to the exact language the panel and the ATS are looking for.
1. Treat Every Application as a Unique Document
The single most impactful thing you can do is tailor your resume and pitch for every single application. This does not mean rewriting your entire resume. It means reviewing the job advertisement, identifying the five to eight most important keywords and capability names, and checking that those exact phrases appear in the most prominent positions in your resume — the professional summary, the key skills section, and the most recent role description.
2. Lead With Your Strongest Evidence First
PageUp weights content that appears early in the document. Your professional summary should read as a condensed case for your merit — not a biography. Open with a direct statement of your most relevant capability, name your classification level and years of experience, and cite one specific achievement. This approach serves both the ATS scan and the human reader.
3. Quantify Everything You Reasonably Can
Numbers are the most credible form of evidence in an APS application. Budget figures, team sizes, project timelines, process improvements, stakeholder numbers, compliance rates — any metric that demonstrates the scale and impact of your work makes your claims more specific and more memorable. Panels read dozens of applications. A resume with three quantified achievements stands apart from one with none.
4. Use the Capability Framework Language of the Correct Jurisdiction
APS, NSW, VIC, QLD and other state government agencies all use different capability frameworks with different terminology. Using APS ILS language in a NSW Government application — or vice versa — will reduce your keyword match score and signal to the panel that you have not tailored your application. Always identify the correct framework before writing a single word.
5. Address the Unwritten Criterion: Cultural Fit
Every APS agency has a published set of values and a strategic direction. Reference both in your pitch and your cover letter where appropriate. Name the agency’s current priorities — not as a generic compliment, but as a genuine reason your skills are well-timed. Panels notice when applicants have done their research. It signals motivation, professionalism, and the kind of initiative that APS roles require.
6. Don’t Forget the Interview Is Part of the Selection Process
Your resume and pitch are designed to get you to an interview. The interview is where you win the role. Invest time in preparing STAR examples for the interview that go beyond what you submitted in writing — broader examples, different contexts, deeper reflection on your professional development. The strongest APS candidates are those who show consistent evidence across both the written and verbal stages.
→ See our APS Interview Coaching Services
Capability Framework Quick Reference by Jurisdiction
The capability framework used in your application determines which keywords the ATS is scanning for. Using the wrong framework’s language is one of the most common — and most preventable — errors in government job applications in Australia.
| Jurisdiction |
Capability Framework |
Key Document |
| APS (Federal) |
Integrated Leadership System (ILS) + APS Work Level Standards |
APSC website — apsc.gov.au |
| NSW Government |
NSW Public Sector Capability Framework (PSCF) |
psc.nsw.gov.au |
| Victorian Government (VPS) |
Victorian Public Sector Capability Framework |
vpsc.vic.gov.au |
| ACT Government |
ACTPS Behavioural Capabilities Framework |
cmtedd.act.gov.au |
| Queensland Government |
Leadership Competencies for Queensland (LCQ) |
forgov.qld.gov.au |
| South Australia |
SA Public Sector Act competency requirements |
publicsector.sa.gov.au |
| Western Australia |
WA Leadership Capability Framework |
wa.gov.au |
| Tasmania |
Tasmanian State Service competency framework |
dpac.tas.gov.au |
For NSW Government roles specifically, the NSW PSCF uses capability names including “Deliver Results,” “Think and Solve Problems,” “Manage Self,” “Communicate Effectively,” and “Commit to Customer Service.” These are substantially different from ILS capability names. Never use ILS language in an NSW Government application.
→ State Government Interview Coaching — NSW, VIC, QLD, WA, SA and ACT
→ NSW Government Interview Coaching
→ Victorian Public Service (VPS) Interview Coaching
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I submit my APS resume as a PDF or a Word document?
Submit as a .docx Word document wherever the application allows it. PageUp parses Word documents more reliably than PDFs. If the role requires a PDF submission, export directly from Word — do not use a design tool or converter that may alter the text layer of the file.
How long should an APS resume be?
APS resumes are typically two to four pages, depending on classification level. APS3–APS5: two to three pages. APS6–EL1: three to four pages. EL2 and above: up to five pages. Remove roles more than 15 years old unless directly relevant. The focus should be on the most recent 10 years of experience, with older roles summarised briefly if included at all.
What keywords should I include in an APS resume?
Your APS resume should include the exact ILS capability names from the job advertisement (such as “Achieves Results,” “Communicates with Influence,” and “Supports Productive Working Relationships”), the technical terms specific to the role (such as “policy development,” “stakeholder engagement,” or “budget management”), and the action verbs used in the job advertisement’s key duties section. All keywords should appear verbatim — not paraphrased.
Does PageUp read PDF resumes correctly?
Not always. PDFs with complex layouts, multiple columns, images, or non-standard fonts can produce parsing errors in PageUp. The safest option is always a clean, single-column .docx file. If you must submit a PDF, test it by converting the PDF back to text (paste into Notepad) and check that the output reads cleanly and in the correct order.
Is it acceptable to use ChatGPT or AI to write APS selection criteria?
AI tools can help you structure and draft selection criteria responses, but the STAR examples must be based on your own real experience. AI does not know what you did or achieved, so any AI-generated evidence will be generic and unverifiable. Some APS agencies now include integrity declarations in their application forms. The safest and most effective approach is to use AI for structure and grammar, then write all evidence in your own words from your own career history.
How do I know which ILS capabilities to address in my APS resume?
The job advertisement will list the selection criteria and the ILS capability names relevant to the role. These are your targets. Every capability name listed in the advertisement should appear at least once in your resume — in the professional summary, the key skills section, or within your role descriptions. Focus on the capabilities listed as “mandatory” or under “what we are looking for” first.
What is the difference between APS selection criteria and a pitch statement?
Selection criteria are individual written responses, typically one per criterion, submitted as separate answers within a PageUp application form. A pitch statement (also called a statement of claims) is a single integrated document — usually 500 to 1000 words — that addresses all criteria together in a structured argument. Which format is required will be specified in the job advertisement. Both use the STAR method of evidence; the pitch requires you to weave the evidence into a cohesive narrative rather than separate responses.
Related Resources
This guide was written by the PS Interview Coach team. Our lead coach has over 20 years of experience in APS recruitment, including as a selection panel member across multiple federal agencies. PS Interview Coach provides specialist coaching for APS and state government job applications, from APS3 to the Senior Executive Service.
Book a consultation with an APS career coach →
by APS Interview Coach | Mar 5, 2026 | APS PageUp Ai ATS
Home ›
APS Interview Tips & Resources ›
How to Write an APS Pitch Statement
APS Applications & AI Shortlisting
By APS Interview Coach | Updated March 2025 | ⏱ 12 min read
Most APS applicants spend hours crafting a pitch statement — only to have it filtered out before a human panel ever reads it. The reason is rarely a lack of skill. It’s a mismatch between the language in your pitch and the keywords that PageUp, the ATS used by most APS agencies, is scanning for.
This guide explains exactly how the APS pitch works, what PageUp looks for, and how to write a pitch statement that passes the AI scoring stage and lands with the selection panel.
The Core Problem
PageUp matches your pitch against the language of the job advertisement and selection criteria. If your pitch doesn’t use the exact capability names and action verbs from the ad — even if your experience is excellent — your application can be ranked lower before a human ever reads it. This guide shows you how to fix that.
In This Article
- APS Pitch vs Cover Letter: What’s the Difference?
- How PageUp Reads and Scores Your Pitch
- The APS Pitch Structure (with Annotated Template)
- ILS Capabilities: The Keywords PageUp Is Looking For
- Writing Your STAR Examples
- State Government Cover Letters vs APS Pitches
- 6 Mistakes That Kill APS Pitch Statements
- Frequently Asked Questions
APS Pitch vs Cover Letter: What’s the Difference?
Quick Answer
An APS pitch statement (also called a statement of claims) is not a traditional cover letter. Rather than summarising your career history, it is a structured argument demonstrating your evidence against the specific selection criteria and ILS capabilities listed in the job advertisement. Most APS agencies require a pitch of 500–1000 words submitted directly into a PageUp text box.
If you have applied for private sector roles recently, the APS pitch will feel unfamiliar. Traditional cover letters introduce you to a hiring manager and highlight your personality and enthusiasm. An APS pitch does something different — it is a direct, evidence-based case for why you meet the merit requirements for the role.
Here are the key differences:
| Traditional Cover Letter |
APS Pitch Statement |
| Introduces the applicant |
Argues the case for merit against selection criteria |
| Summary of career history |
Evidence-based STAR examples |
| Flexible format and length |
Strict word limit enforced by PageUp (usually 500–600 words) |
| Focuses on personality and motivation |
Focuses on capability and evidence |
| Addressed to a hiring manager |
Written to the selection criteria — no greeting required |
| Submitted as a document |
Entered as plain text in a PageUp form field |
Some APS roles still ask for a traditional cover letter alongside the pitch, particularly at senior levels. Where both are required, the cover letter handles the introduction and motivation, while the pitch carries the evidence. When in doubt, treat the pitch as your primary document.
📖 Government Terms Glossary
Confused by APS terminology? Our glossary explains pitch statements, selection criteria, merit pools and more.
How PageUp Reads and Scores Your Pitch
PageUp is the applicant tracking system (ATS) used by the majority of APS agencies to manage recruitment. When you submit your application, PageUp processes it before it reaches a human selection panel. Understanding how this works is the first step to writing a pitch that gets through.
What PageUp Actually Does
PageUp does not read your pitch the way a person does. It scans the text and compares the words and phrases in your application to the words and phrases in the job advertisement and selection criteria. It then assigns a match score. Applications that score below a threshold may be ranked lower in the shortlist queue, meaning a human panel may not reach them at all — or will see them after stronger-scoring applications have already filled the available interview spots.
Important Context
PageUp’s keyword matching is not “AI” in the sense of ChatGPT or Gemini. It does not understand context or intent. It recognises words and phrases. An application that says “manages relationships with partners” will not score as well as one that says “supports productive working relationships” — even if they mean the same thing. The APS Work Level Standards and ILS capability names are the exact phrases the system is looking for.
Why Formatting Matters in PageUp
The PageUp pitch field is a plain text input. If you paste in content with special characters, unusual line breaks, or formatting copied from Microsoft Word, it can appear corrupted or be parsed incorrectly. Write and review your pitch in plain text before submitting. Avoid em-dashes, curly quotes, and bullet points — PageUp may render these as garbled characters.
For your resume (a separate document upload), the same principle applies at a higher level. Avoid tables, columns, headers and footers, and decorative formatting. These layout elements interfere with PageUp’s document parsing and can cause critical information to be missed entirely.
🤖 APS AI Recruitment Tips
See our full guide to how AI and ATS tools are used across APS agencies — and how to optimise for both.
The APS Pitch Structure (with Annotated Template)
A well-structured APS pitch follows a consistent pattern that works for both the ATS scoring stage and the human panel review. The following structure is appropriate for most APS3–EL1 pitch requirements.
- Opening Claim (40–60 words): State your strongest claim to the role immediately. Do not open with “I am writing to apply for.” Begin with a direct statement of what you bring to this role and why you are qualified. Reference the role title and at least one core capability.
- STAR Example 1 (130–160 words): Address the first or most critical selection criterion. Use the STAR method: set the context briefly, state your specific task, describe your actions in detail, and quantify the result. The ILS capability name must appear in this section.
- STAR Example 2 (130–160 words): Address the second key criterion. Use a different example — never reuse the same scenario for multiple criteria. Vary the context (different project, team, or agency) to demonstrate breadth.
- Optional: Brief third example or skills statement (60–80 words): If word count permits, add a third short example or a direct statement addressing a specific technical requirement, qualification, or capability from the ad.
- Closing Statement (40–60 words): Close with a forward-looking statement that connects your goals and values to the agency’s mission. Name the agency specifically. Avoid generic lines like “I look forward to discussing my application.”
Annotated Pitch Template
// OPENING CLAIM
With [X] years of experience in [relevant field] across [agency/sector], I bring a demonstrated capacity to [key capability from the ad]. In my current role as [title] at [agency], I have consistently [specific achievement relevant to the role], making me well placed to contribute to [team/division name].
Target: 40–60 words | Must include: role title, one ILS capability name, one specific achievement
// STAR EXAMPLE 1 — [Capability Name from Ad]
[Situation: 2 sentences — agency, context, challenge.] [Task: 1 sentence — your specific responsibility.] [Action: 4–5 sentences — what you specifically did, tools used, stakeholders engaged, decisions made. Use first person active verbs: led, developed, negotiated, implemented.] [Result: 1–2 sentences — quantified outcome, recognition, or ongoing impact.]
Target: 130–160 words | Must include: ILS capability name, quantified result, first-person voice
// STAR EXAMPLE 2 — [Second Capability from Ad]
[Use a different scenario to Example 1. Same STAR structure. Different context demonstrates breadth.]
Target: 130–160 words | Different example from STAR 1
// CLOSING STATEMENT
I am drawn to this opportunity at [agency name] because [specific reason linked to the agency’s mission, current priorities, or strategic direction]. I am committed to [APS value — e.g. integrity, service, professionalism] and am confident I can make an immediate contribution to [team/outcome].
Target: 40–60 words | Must include: agency name, one APS value, forward-looking language
Word Count Tip
If your pitch limit is 500 words, aim to land between 480 and 498. Never go over. PageUp enforces word or character limits strictly — excess content may be truncated, cutting off your closing statement entirely.
ILS Capabilities: The Keywords PageUp Is Looking For
The Integrated Leadership System (ILS) is the APS capability framework that defines what effective performance looks like at each classification level. The capability names in the ILS are the exact phrases that appear in APS job advertisements — and the exact phrases that PageUp is matching against your pitch.
Using the correct ILS capability name — not a synonym, not a paraphrase — is one of the most impactful things you can do to improve your PageUp match score.
Core ILS Capabilities — Use These Exact Names
Shapes Strategic Thinking — Inspires a sense of purpose and direction | Achieves Results — Delivers on strategy and builds organisational capability | Cultivates Productive Working Relationships — Nurtures internal and external relationships | Exemplifies Personal Drive and Integrity — Engages personal strengths and capabilities | Communicates with Influence — Communicates clearly and with purpose | Supports Productive Working Relationships (EL1 and below) | Applies Government Frameworks | Drives Strategic Thinking
How to Use ILS Capability Names in Your Pitch
The goal is not to drop capability names mechanically into your text. It is to embed them naturally as part of a genuine evidence-based statement. Compare the following two approaches:
Poor (keyword stuffing — PageUp scores it, panels reject it):
“I have demonstrated Achieves Results in my role by achieving results and communicating with influence in stakeholder communications.”
Effective (natural integration):
“This project required me to Achieves Results under significant time and resource pressure. I developed a phased implementation plan, managed competing stakeholder priorities across three divisions, and delivered the policy framework two weeks ahead of the original deadline — an outcome recognised by the Deputy Secretary in the subsequent all-staff briefing.”
The second version uses the ILS capability name once, naturally embedded, and immediately backs it with specific evidence. The panel sees expertise; PageUp sees the keyword. Both audiences are satisfied.
📋 APS Selection Criteria Writing Service
Need expert help aligning your experience to the ILS? Our selection criteria coaches work with you to develop pitch-ready STAR examples.
Writing Your STAR Examples
The STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) is the standard structure for APS pitch and selection criteria responses. Most APS applicants know the method — the challenge is applying it in a way that is specific enough to score well with PageUp and compelling enough to impress the panel.
The Four Elements Done Right
Situation: Set the context in two sentences maximum. Name the agency (or say “a Commonwealth agency”), the size of the team, and the nature of the challenge. Do not spend 60 words describing background. The panel does not need the full backstory — they need to know the stakes.
Task: One sentence. What was specifically your responsibility — not the team’s, not your manager’s, yours. This is a common failure point. Many applicants describe a team achievement without establishing their individual accountability. The APS merit principle requires evidence of what you personally did.
Action: This is the longest and most important section of your STAR example. Use first-person active verbs: developed, led, negotiated, implemented, advised, designed, managed. Describe the specific steps you took, the decisions you made, the stakeholders you engaged, and the tools or methods you used. This is where ILS capability language appears most naturally.
Result: Quantify wherever possible. Numbers, percentages, timeframes, and scale all signal credibility — to both PageUp and the panel. If you cannot quantify the outcome, name who recognised it, what changed as a result, or what the ongoing impact has been.
Worked Example — “Achieves Results” (APS Policy Context)
As the lead policy officer for a cross-agency working group reviewing the department’s external grants framework, I was responsible for developing the revised assessment criteria and stakeholder consultation process within a 10-week window. The project involved coordinating input from 14 internal subject matter experts and four peak bodies with competing interests. I mapped each stakeholder’s core concern against the draft criteria, facilitated three structured workshops using an interest-based negotiation model, and produced a final framework that addressed all critical objections without compromising the integrity of the original policy intent. The revised framework was adopted without amendment by the Senior Executive Committee and has since reduced the average grants assessment time by 22 per cent, as reported in the department’s 2024–25 annual performance review.
Notice what this example does: it names the specific role, names the scope (14 internal experts, four peak bodies, 10-week window), uses active verbs (coordinating, facilitated, produced), and closes with a quantified result that is independently verifiable. Each sentence is working. There is no filler.
⭐ STAR Method for APS Applications
Our in-depth STAR method guide includes worked examples at APS3, APS6, and EL1 level — with before-and-after comparisons.
State Government Cover Letters vs APS Pitches
The APS pitch format does not automatically transfer to state government applications. Each jurisdiction has its own framework, terminology, and written application format. If you are applying for NSW, Victorian, Queensland, or other state government roles alongside APS positions, you need to adjust your approach for each.
| Jurisdiction |
Framework |
Written Format |
| APS (Federal) |
Integrated Leadership System (ILS) |
Pitch statement — 500–1000 words in PageUp |
| NSW Government |
NSW Public Sector Capability Framework |
Cover letter + targeted questions via PageUp or Taleo |
| Victorian Government (VPS) |
VPS Capability Framework |
Cover letter + key selection criteria responses |
| ACT Government |
ACTPS Behavioural Capabilities Framework |
Pitch or statement of claims — similar to APS format |
| Queensland Government |
Leadership Competencies for Queensland |
Cover letter + targeted questions |
For NSW Government roles, the capability framework language differs from the ILS. Using ILS capability names (such as “Achieves Results”) in a NSW application will not match the PageUp keywords, which are drawn from the NSW Capability Framework (for example, “Deliver Results” and “Think and Solve Problems”). Always check the framework before writing.
🏛️ State Government Interview Coaching
We coach applicants for NSW, VIC, QLD, WA, SA and ACT government roles — with framework-specific guidance for each jurisdiction.
6 Mistakes That Kill APS Pitch Statements
- Opening with “I am writing to apply for…” – PageUp scores from the beginning of your text. Starting with a generic phrase wastes the first 10–15 words and delays the keyword-rich content that PageUp is looking for. Begin with your claim or your strongest STAR opening instead.
- Using synonyms instead of exact capability names – “Managing stakeholder relationships” is not the same as “Supports Productive Working Relationships” to PageUp. The system does literal keyword matching. Use the exact ILS capability names as they appear in the job advertisement.
- Submitting the same pitch for multiple roles – Each job advertisement uses different capability language. A pitch optimised for one role will not match the keywords in another — even within the same agency. Every application requires a tailored pitch.
- Describing team achievements without claiming individual contribution – “Our team delivered the project” does not satisfy the APS merit principle, which requires evidence of your individual capability. Every STAR example must make your specific role, decisions, and actions explicit.
- Using AI-generated content without personalising it – AI tools produce generic language. They do not know what you did, who you worked with, or what you achieved. AI-generated pitches often pass PageUp but fail the human panel stage — because they lack the specific, first-person evidence that experienced APS recruiters expect to see.
- Exceeding the word limit – PageUp enforces word and character limits strictly. If your pitch exceeds the limit, the text is truncated at submission — meaning your closing statement and possibly your final STAR example will be cut off before the panel reads them. Always count your words before submitting.
On Using AI Tools
AI tools (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) can help you brainstorm structure, check grammar, or generate a rough draft. They cannot write your STAR examples — because they do not know what you did. Use AI to prepare; write the evidence yourself. Some APS agencies have also begun including integrity statements in their application forms specifically asking applicants to confirm the content is their own.
Want Your Pitch Reviewed by an APS Expert?
Our coaches have worked inside APS recruitment panels at agency and departmental level. We’ll review your pitch, identify keyword gaps, and help you produce a final version that’s optimised for both PageUp and the human panel.
Get Your Pitch Reviewed | View All Services
Frequently Asked Questions
How long should an APS pitch statement be?
Most APS pitch statements have a strict word limit set in PageUp, typically between 500 and 1000 words. The most common limit is 500–600 words. Always check the specific word or character limit in the PageUp application form for the role you are applying for — limits vary by agency and classification level.
What is the difference between an APS pitch and a cover letter?
An APS pitch statement is specific to the Australian Public Service. Unlike a traditional cover letter, an APS pitch focuses directly on the selection criteria and ILS capabilities listed in the job advertisement. It uses STAR examples to demonstrate evidence against the criteria, rather than summarising your career history. Most APS pitches are submitted as plain text in a PageUp text box — not as a separate document.
Should I use dot points or paragraphs in my APS pitch?
Use paragraphs. The PageUp text box has limited formatting options, and dot points can appear inconsistently across different systems and browsers. Cohesive paragraphs with clear STAR structure are more readable for the selection panel and demonstrate stronger written communication skills — a capability assessed in many APS roles.
Can I use the same pitch for multiple APS roles?
No. PageUp scores your pitch against the specific keywords and capabilities in each job advertisement. A generic pitch will score poorly against the ATS and will not address the specific selection criteria. Even for similar roles within the same agency, the capability language and emphasis can differ significantly. Every APS application requires a tailored pitch.
Does PageUp screen APS pitch statements with AI?
PageUp uses keyword matching and scoring to rank applications against the job description and selection criteria before they reach a human panel. While this is not “AI” in the ChatGPT sense, the filtering effect is real: applications that do not closely match the language of the job advertisement may be ranked lower or reached last. APSC guidelines require a human to make all shortlisting decisions — but the order in which applications are reviewed is influenced by PageUp’s scoring.
What does PageUp look for in an APS cover letter or pitch?
PageUp looks for keyword matches between your pitch text and the job advertisement and selection criteria. Specifically, it scans for the ILS capability names (such as “Achieves Results” and “Communicates with Influence”), role-specific technical terms, and action verbs that mirror the language of the ad. The closer your pitch language matches the ad language, the higher your application is likely to be ranked in the PageUp shortlist queue.
Related Guides & Resources
- ❓ APS Interview Questions — What to Expect
Once your pitch gets you to interview, here are the behavioural and technical questions APS panels ask — with structured response tips.
- ✏️ APS Selection Criteria Writing Tips (Free PDF)
Download our free selection criteria writing guide for APS3 to APS6 roles — with annotated examples and common pitfall checklists.
- ✅ APS Interview Preparation Checklist
Our step-by-step checklist covers everything from application submission to interview day — including a pitch self-review section.
- 📄 APS Resume Services
A PageUp-optimised resume works alongside your pitch. Our resume writers specialise in APS formatting, keyword alignment, and capability framework language.
About the Author: APS Interview Coach
PS Interview Coach — Lead Coach & Founder
Our lead coach has over 20 years of experience in APS recruitment, having sat on selection panels across multiple federal agencies and worked at both APS and EL level. PS Interview Coach has helped hundreds of Australians land roles in the APS and state government — from APS3 to Senior Executive Service.
Ready to Write a Pitch That Gets You Shortlisted?
Our APS coaches work with you one-on-one to develop a pitch statement that’s optimised for PageUp, aligned to the ILS, and backed by the strongest evidence from your career history.
Book a Consultation | Browse All Resources